The Impact of Identity on the Success of Peacekeeping Missions: The Pakistani Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v7i2.174Keywords:
Identity, Psychosocial, Peacekeeping, United NationsAbstract
Modern peacekeepers face many challenges in the areas in which they are deployed, including often dealing with a non-cooperative host population. However, if the peacekeepers shared an identity characteristic (this paper focuses on race, religion, language, gender, and geo-economics) with the host population, would this improve how peacekeepers and the host population interact, increasing the chances of the mission’s success? This study aims to answer this question and propose whether the UN should deploy peacekeeping troops based on this common identity criteria. Since the research was qualitative, data was primarily collected through interviews and focus group discussions with veteran and undertraining peacekeepers. After an extensive thematic analysis of the interviews, the thesis yielded the following results: a) A positive link exists between a shared identity (amongst peacekeepers and civilians) and success in peacekeeping missions b) Impartiality and timely provision of humanitarian assistance builds the good reputation of a UN contingent and can enhance ‘local acceptance’ for a peacekeeping mission c) While peacekeepers should not be deployed based on identity, language training before deployment can vastly improve how peacekeepers interact with the local populace. Hence, while the UN does not need to amend its deployment policies, language is a crucial identity characteristic that the UN can utilize to improve success in peacekeeping missions
References
Agha, A. (2023). Efficacy of lessons learnt and best practices in UN training. In T. Yamin (Ed.), International peacekeeping: Perspectives from Pakistan (pp. 129–139). IPS Press. https://press.ips.org.pk/product/international-peacekeeping-perspectives-from-pakistan/
Aksu, E. (2003). The UN, intra-state peacekeeping and normative changes. Manchester University Press. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/34993
Bove, V., & Ruggeri, A. (2016). Kinds of blue: Diversity in UN peacekeeping missions and civilian protection. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 681-700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000034
United Nations. (2000). Brahimi Report. https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/a_55_305_e_brahimi_report.pdf
Cuhadar, E., & Dayton, B. (2011). The social psychology of identity and inter-group conflict: From theory to practice. International Studies Perspectives, 12(3), 273-293. https://academic.oup.com/isp/article-abstract/12/3/273/1830808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00433.x
Fearon, J. D. (1999). What is identity (as we now use the word). Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, 1-43. http://www.web.stanford.edu/group/fearon-research/cgi-bin/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/What-is-Identity-as-we-now-use-the-word-.pdf
Franke, V. C. (1999). Resolving identity tensions: The case of the peacekeeper. Journal of Conflict Studies, 19(2), 124-143. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs19_02art05
Cinoğlu, H., & Arıkan, Y. (2012). Self, identity and identity formation: From the perspectives of three major theories. Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1114-1131.https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/ijhs/article/view/2429
Kiani, M. (2004). Pakistan's Contribution to UN Peacekeeping. Strategic Studies, 24(3), 41-72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45242538
Le Roy, A., & Malcorra, S. (2009). A new partnership agenda: Charting a new horizon for UN peacekeeping. UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support.
Leone, S., & Reno, W. (2001). The failure of peacekeeping. Current History, 100(646), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2001.100.646.219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2001.100.646.219
Najimdeen, B. (2020). UN peacekeeping operations and successful military diplomacy: A case study of Pakistan. NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability, 13-25. https://njips.nust.edu.pk/index.php/njips/article/view/37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v3i1.37
Nalbandov, R. (2009). Foreign intervention in ethnic conflicts. Ashgate Publishing Limited. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315582795/foreign-interventions-ethnic-conflicts-robert-nalbandov
Peter, M. (2015). Between Doctrine and Practice: The UN Peacekeeping Dilemma. Global Governance, 21(3), 351–370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24526252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02103002
Sebastián, S., & Gorur, A. (2018). UN Peacekeeping and Host-State Consent: How Missions Navigate Relationships with Governments (Washington, DC: Stimson Center).
Tsagourias, N. (2006). Consent, neutrality/impartiality and the use of force in peacekeeping: their constitutional dimension. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 11(3), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krl016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krl016
Victor, J. (2010). African peacekeeping in Africa: Warlord politics, defense economics, and state legitimacy. Journal of Peace Research, 47(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309354142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309354142
Whalan, J. (2013). How peace operations work: Power, legitimacy, and effectiveness. OUP Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672189.001.0001
Woodhouse, T. (1998). Peacekeeping and the psychology of conflict resolution. The Psychology of Peacekeeping. Westport: Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216002796.ch-011
Yamin, T. (2017). Pakistan’s foreign policy motivations in sending troops abroad. NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability, 1-21. https://njips.nust.edu.pk/index.php/njips/article/view/1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v1i1.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1.png)
