A Synopsis of Perspectives on (United Nations) Peace Operations from Theories of International Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v5i2.131Keywords:
Peace operations, theories, international relations, peacekeepingAbstract
The post-Cold War era witnessed a significant increase in the size and scope of peace operations. However, the role and purpose of peace operations have not received commensurate attention within the intellectual context of theories of international relations. Comprehension of theoretical foundations of international relations is quintessential in understanding the motives behind and implications of third-party intervention in the quest for viable peace. This paper presents a synopsis of major theoretical paradigms in world politics with particular emphasis on their understanding of and implications for contemporary peace operations. The paper strives to delineate the central planks of a particular theoretical paradigm with special reference to the underpinnings of peace operations. Towards the end, the prospect of training peacekeepers to bridge the theory and practice of peace operations has been explored. The research findings shall fill a theoretical gap in peace operations studies and decipher the theoretical basis of the acerbic arguments against peace operations espoused by the obstructionists to the peace processes.
References
Adams, K. R. (2006). Structural Realism: The Consequences of Great Power Politics. In J. Sterling-Folker (Ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory (pp. 18-37). USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Asal, V., Miller, I., & Willis, C. N. (2020). System, state, or individual: Gaming levels of analysis in international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 21(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekz018
Bellamy, A. J., & Williams, P. (2004). Introduction: Thinking anew about peace operations. International Peacekeeping, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353331042000228427
Boyer, M. A., & Butler, M. J. (2006). Public Goods Liberalism: The Problems of Collective Action. In J. Sterling- Folker (Ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory (pp. 75-91). USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Brock-Utne, B. (1990). Feminist perspectives on peace. In P. Smoker, R. Davies, & B. Munske (Eds.), A Reader in Peace Studies (pp. 144-150). New York: Pergamon Press.
De Coning, C., & Peter, M. (2019). United Nations peace operations in a changing global order. USA: Springer
Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. (1993). Teorías en pugna en las relaciones internacionales: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano Argentina.
Ely, J. C., & Välimäki, J. (2002). A robust folk theorem for the prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 102(1), 84-105. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2774
Fetherston, A. (1994a). Outlining a Theoretical Approach. In Towards a Theory of United Nations Peacekeeping (pp. 88-123): Springer.
Fetherston, A. B. (1994b). Towards a theory of United Nations peacekeeping. New York: St. Martin’s Press
Galtung, J., & Fischer, D. (2013). Positive and negative peace. In Johan Galtung (pp. 173-178). USA: Springer.
Jackson, P. T. (2006). Relational constructivism: A war of words. In J. Sterling-Folker (Ed.), Making sense of international relations theory (pp. 139-155). USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Jervis, R. (1999). Realism, neoliberalism, and cooperation: understanding the debate. International security, 24(1), 42-63.
Jørgensen, K. E. (2017). International relations theory: A new introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Karlsrud, J. (2018). Are UN Peacekeeping Missions Moving Toward “Chapter Seven and a Half Operations?” http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2486826
Kay, S. (2006). Neoliberalism: Institutions at War. In J. Sterling-Folker (Ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory (pp. 62-74). USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International security, 20(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.20.1.39
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International organization, 55(4), 761-799. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592
Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in educational research, 16(2), 193-205.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2017). The false promise of international institutions. In International organization (pp. 237-282). USA: Routledge.
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Alterman, G. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. USA: WW Norton & Company.
Oksamytna, K., & Karlsrud, J. (2020). United Nations peace operations and International Relations theory: An introduction. In United Nations peace operations and International Relations theory (pp. 1-30): Manchester University Press.
Pfaltzgraff Jr, R. L. (1997). Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Pugh, M. (2003). Peacekeeping and IR theory: Phantom of the opera? International Peacekeeping, 10(4), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310308559351
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International organization, 52(4), 855-885. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550770
Steigerwald, D. (1994). Wilsonian idealism in America. USA: Cornell University Press.
Sterling-Folker, J. A. (2006). Making sense of international relations theory. Boulder Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers
Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: one world, many theories. Foreign policy, 29-46.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing international politics. International security, 20(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539217
1.png)
