Modelling Conflict and Cooperation: A Mathematical Approach to International Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v8i2.200Keywords:
Mathematical modelling, conflict resolution, game theory, geopolitical analysis, international cooperationAbstract
Contemporary research in international relations necessitates innovative and interdisciplinary approaches that not only deepen our understanding of the complexities of the global system but also contribute to practical solutions for conflict resolution and the advancement of peace and stability. One of these integrated approaches is mathematical modelling, which includes game theory, network analysis, and dynamical system models. The game theory model offers a framework to analyse situations involving mutually dependent decision-making and the impact of these decisions on others. Likewise, network analysis and dynamical system models can be utilised to comprehend various scenarios of conflict and cooperation between states. This paper presents a hypothetical formulation of a game-theoretical model to assess the applicability of mathematical modelling to real-world situations. It discusses the use of utility functions and analyses Nash equilibrium, Pareto optimality, and the security dilemma to grasp the complexities of decision-making. The research focuses on prominent theoretical frameworks of international relations, namely realism and idealism, to demonstrate that mathematical modelling is equally effective in studying the dynamics and behaviour of an international system where sovereign states make strategic choices based on their national interests.
References
Brisset, S., & Gillon, F. (2015). Approaches for multi-objective optimization in the ecodesign of electric systems. Eco-friendly innovation in electricity transmission and distribution networks, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-010-1.00004-5
Carlson, S. C. (2024). Graph Theory. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/graph-theory
Cerny, P. (2000). The New Security Dilemma: Divisibility, Defection and Disorder in the Global Era. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 624.
CFI Team. (2024). Utility Maximisation. CFI Education Inc. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/utility-maximization/
Clausewitz, C. Von. (1989). On War. Trans. Michael Eliot Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton University Press.
Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium, 10(2), 126-155.
Davis, M. D. & Brams, S. J. (2024). Game Theory. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/game-theory
Eldridge, S. (2024). Nash Equilibrium. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/Nash-equilibrium
Fisunoglu, A. (2018). System Dynamics Modeling in International Relations. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 8(2), 231-253.
Gries, D. (2017). The Shortest-path Algorithm. JavaHyperText and Data Structures. Cornell University. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/JavaAndDS/shortestPath/shortestPath.html
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International organization, 63(3), 559-592.
Halkos, G. E., Kyriazis, N. C., & Economou, E. M. (2021). Plato as a game theorist towards an international trade policy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030115
Hirsch, M. W., Devaney, R. L., & Smale, S. (1974). Differential equations, dynamical systems, and linear algebra (Vol. 60). Academic Press.
Hoffman, P. V. & Lebovic, J. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Network Analysis in International Relations.
Ingham, S. (2024). Pareto-optimality. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/money/Pareto-optimality
Jackson, M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks (Vol. 3, p. 519). Princeton University Press.
Jackson, M. O. (2011). An overview of social networks and economic applications. Handbook of social economics, 1, 511-585.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167-194.
Jervis, R. (1999). Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding theDebate. International Security, 24(1).
Nash, J. F. (1950). The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155-162.
Kant, I. (1795). Towards Perpetual Peace. Konigsberg Publisher.
Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O. & Nye. J. S., Jr. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown & Company
Krasner, S. D. (1983). International Regimes. Cornell University Press.
Krawitz, J., Chang, Y. P., Yang, K. L., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modelling: Improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 337-359.
Mao, Z., Jiang, Y., Min, G., Leng, S., Jin, X., & Yang, K. (2017). Mobile social networks: Design requirements, architecture, and state-of-the-art technology. Computer Communications, 100, 1-19.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. WW Nort, The TCompany.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.
Mercer, J. (1996). Reputation and International Politics. International Organization, 50(2), 341-370.
Milner, H. (1992). International theories of cooperation among nations: Strengths and weaknesses. World politics, 44(3), 466-496.
Morgenthau, H. (1949). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Knopf, NY.
Nagurney, A., & Zhang, D. (1996). Projected Dynamical Systems. In Projected Dynamical Systems and Variational Inequalities with Applications (pp. 9-43). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2301-7_3
Osborne, M. J. & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press.
Oye, K. A. (1986). Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics, 38(2), 245-266.
Peng, S., Zhou, Y., Cao, L., Yu, S., Niu, J., & Jia, W. (2018). Influence analysis in social networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 106, 17-32.
Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative political studies, 29(2), 123-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414096029002001
Pilch, R. J. (2001). Modeling the Dynamics of International Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(5), 635-655.
Russett, B. M., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations.
Skyrms, B. (2004). The Stag Hunt and Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis of domain analysis for knowledge organization: Observations on an emergent methodological cluster. KO Knowledge Organization, 42(8), 602-614.
Strogatz, S. H. (2024). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Vipond, T. (2024). What is Sensitivity Analysis? Corporate Finance Institute. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/financial-modeling/what-is-sensitivity-analysis/
Volgy, T. J. & Others. (2012). Dynamical Systems and International Relations. International Studies Review, 14(3), 349-369.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior: 60th anniversary commemorative edition. In Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics, McGraw. New York.
Ward, M. D. (2019). Dynamic analysis of conflict and cooperation: an inquiry into the evolution of international interactions. In Theories, models, and simulations in international relations (pp. 439-461). Routledge.
Wasserman, S. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Weidmann, N. B. (2017). International Relations and the New Science of Complexity. Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391-425.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1.png)
