Assessing the inaction of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Myanmar and Gaza Amidst Atrocity Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v7i2.176Abstract
The global community's failure to prevent severe human rights violations, such as the Rwanda Genocide and Yugoslavian atrocities, led to the development of the "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) doctrine, adopted by the UN in 2005. R2P aims to shield populations from genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Despite its promise, R2P's implementation is hindered by geopolitical interests and power dynamics. To address ongoing atrocities, it is essential to strengthen international accountability mechanisms and prioritize civilian protection, ensuring such violations are neither tolerated nor inevitable.
References
Cordall, S. S. (2024). Is the US shipping weapons to Israel tacit support for its war on Gaza? Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/15/weapons-shipment-to-israel-underscores-us-support-for-war-on-gaza
Gepp, M. (2021). The Road Not Taken: Failure to Protect from Atrocity Crimes in Myanmar. Groningen Journal of International Law, 9(1), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.21827/GroJIL.9.1.78-100
Ibrahim, H., & Nordin, R. (2015). The principle of responsibility to protect: The Case of Rohingya in Myanmar. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 1-18. https://core.ac.uk/reader/153832270#page=15
Islam, M. (2020). The Dilemma of Stateless Rohingya: Priority for Responsibility to Protect (R2P). BPA Journal, 2(2), 67-97.
Karanth, S. (2023). Israeli Defence Minister Announces Siege on Gaza to Fight ‘Human Animals.’ HuffPost. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/israel-defence-minister-human-animals-gaza-palestine_uk_65245ebae4b0a32c15bfe6b6
Kingston, L. N. (2015). Protecting the world’s most persecuted: the responsibility to protect and Burma’s Rohingya minority. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(8), 1163-1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1082831
Leatherby, N. (2023). Gaza Civilians, Under Israeli Barrage, Are Being Killed at Historic Pace. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/25/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-death-toll.html
Mennecke, M., & Stensrud, E. E. (2021). The Failure of the International Community to Apply R2P and Atrocity Prevention in Myanmar. Global Responsibility to Protect, 13(2-3), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984X-13020013
Moses, J. (2024). Gaza and the Political and Moral Failure of the Responsibility to Protect. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2024.2304987
UN General Assembly. (2005). 60/1 (2005 World Summit Outcome), UN Doc. A/Res/60/1, 16.
UNHCR. Myanmar situation. (n.d.). Global Focus. https://reporting.unhcr.org/operational/situations/myanmar-situation
Reuters. (2024). Details of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/details-humanitarian-crisis-gaza-2024-05-01/
Syed, I. (2019). To Intervene or Not to Intervene: Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Myanmar. IPRI journals, 19(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.190105.
Vasisht, C. (2024). Can ASEAN achieve peace in Myanmar- A review of the Five-point Consensus. Vivekananda International Foundation. https://www.vifindia.org/article/2024/may/14/Can-ASEAN-Achieve-Peace-in-Myanmar
Wade, F. (2015). Myanmar’s Enemy Within Buddhist Violence and the Making of a Muslim ‘Other.’ Bloomsbury Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1.png)
